How to bid in this country: portals, deadlines, thresholds →
Supplies of surgical, microsurgical, ENT, ophthalmic and gynecological instruments and bronchoscope, endoscopic optics and ear speculum attachment system
Dostawy narzędzi chirurgicznych, mikrochirurgicznych, laryngologicznych, okulistycznych oraz ginekologicznych oraz bronchoskopu, optyki endoskopowej i systemu mocowania wzierników usznych — original title
Your path to submission
- Deadline: 18 November at 09:00 — 17 days left.
- The submission point is stated in the notice (link on this page).
- Offer and evidence in: Polish.
- Collect your evidence — the eligibility requirements are listed on this page; for many of them the analysis explains how to obtain them.
What the buyer is looking for
1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical, microsurgical, laryngological, ophthalmic and gynecological instruments and a bronchoscope, endoscopic optics and ear speculum attachment system for the needs of the Fryderyk Chopin University Clinical Hospital in Rzeszów. 2. The detailed description of the objects of the order, the estimated quantity and the requirements are as follows: Price and quotation forms – Annexes 1 to the ToR for Parts 1 to 18, Summary of required parameters – Annexes 2 to the ToR for Parts 1 to 9; 12-13; 15-18, which are an integral part of the ToR. 3. The requirements relating to the manner of performance of the contract, in particular the rights and obligations of the Parties, the rules for performance of the contract, acceptance of the subject of the contract, payment terms, liability of the Parties and other conditions for performance of the…
Show full description
… contract are set out in the Draft Provisions of the Agreement, constituting Annex 9 to the ToR. These documents are an integral part of the Terms and Conditions. 4. The scope of the order includes the delivery of the items of the order in the quantities specified in the Price and Offer Forms, which are an integral part of the ToR for a period of 24 months. 5. The Ordering Party reserves the right to use the option (optional order) referred to in Art. 1 and Article 441(1) 1 of the Public Procurement Act on the terms and procedures described in the draft provisions of the public procurement contract. 6. The contracting authority does not allow variants to be submitted. 7. The Contracting Authority shall not allow the submission of equivalent tenders in Lots 7, 10, 11, 14. 8. The Ordering Party accepts in Lots No. 1-6; 8-9; 12-13; 15-18 solutions equivalent to those described in the description of the subject of the contract: Whenever reference is made in the description of the subject-matter of the contract to standards, European technical assessments, approvals, technical specifications, technical reference systems as referred to in Article 101(1)(b) EUTMR. 1 point 2 and paras. 3 PPL, it is assumed that such indications are accompanied by the words "or equivalent". An economic operator which, in its tender, refers to solutions equivalent to those described by the contracting authority is required to demonstrate in its tender, in particular by means of the means of proof referred to in Articles 104 to 107 of the Public Procurement Law, that the solutions it proposes meet in an equivalent manner the requirements specified by the contracting authority in the description of the subject-matter of the contract. 9. The Ordering Party allows the submission of partial tenders, where each complete part is a part. A tender may be submitted for one, several or all lots. There are 18 lots in these proceedings. 10. DATE OF COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT: 1) The term of the contract - for 24 months, counting from the date of conclusion of the contract. 2) The Ordering Party allows for the possibility of changing the term of the contract in the event of failure to complete the entire subject of the contract during the contract period as a result of the implementation of lower orders - the amendment of the contract requires an annex, except that the Ordering Party unilaterally notifies the Contractor about the proposed extension of the contract before the expiry of the period for which it was concluded. · 1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical, microsurgical, laryngological, ophthalmic and gynecological instruments and a bronchoscope, endoscopic optics and ear speculum attachment system for the needs of the Fryderyk Chopin University Clinical Hospital in Rzeszów, including: Surgical tools for maxillofacial operations for the Surgery Unit of the Clinic of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2. The detailed description of the objects of the order, the estimated quantity and the requirements are as follows: Price and quotation form – Annex 1 to the ToR for Part 1, Summary of required parameters – Annex 2 to the ToR for Part 1, which is an integral part of the ToR. 3. Requirements concerning the manner of performance of the contract, in particular the rights and obligations of the Parties, the rules of performance of the contract, acceptance of the subject of the contract, payment terms, liability of the Parties and other conditions of performance of the contract are set out in the Draft Provisions of the Agreement
Contract
Type of service
Clement What the numbers say about this buyer
- In this sector the buyer awards roughly every month (1046 awards, most recently October 2026) — the next award is due around November 2026 by that rhythm. The last award went to Takeda Pharma Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością.n = 1,046
- 61% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (1,241 awards since 2021, spread over 460 companies). 39% went to new names.n = 1,241 awards since 2021
- The median procedure drew 3 bids (884 procedures with a bid count); 23% ended with a single bidder. Sector: median 3 bids.n = 884
- 31% of the bids received came from small and medium-sized enterprises (236 procedures with a bid mix). Sector: 49%.n = 236
- Across 9 procedures with structured selection criteria, this buyer most often required: Trade register enrolment (9 of 9).n = 9
From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 01/11/2026.
Selection criteria — in the procurement documents
The buyer states in the notice that the selection criteria are in the procurement documents (link on this page), not in the EU form. The document analysis below extracts them from there — bid and evidence in Polish.
Tender documents — direct download
Who has won at this buyer so far
Across all contract types of this buyer — not just this sector. A city buys software and fire engines through the same purchasing office.
| Company | Awards | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Urtica Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością | 56 | 2024–2026 |
| Asclepios Spółka Akcyjna | 42 | 2024–2026 |
| Salus International Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością | 33 | 2024–2026 |
| BIALMED Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością | 25 | 2024–2026 |
| AstraZeneca Kft. | 24 | 2024–2026 |
How often this buyer tenders this kind of work
Tactics
When this buyer has awarded in this sector, usually about 3 bids came in. A normal field for this market. (Based on 831 completed awards — not a statement about this procedure.)
This procedure allows 30 days between publication and deadline — typical in this country is 18 (median of 9,435 procedures). A normal window for this market.
Foreign bidders
In Poland · Medical equipment & pharma, 5,512 contracts went to foreign companies over the last 3 years (of 283,684 recorded awards) — mostly from Germany, France, Czechia.
Submission language: Polish.
How to bid
Guide: how to apply on e-Zamówienia (Polen) → Registration, signature, fees — from the operator's bidder manual.
Don't miss the next one
Friedrich finds tenders like this for you — every morning at 7:30, each one checked by Claude (Anthropic) for fit, and he learns from your feedback what your company really does.
Register now