KPN/26/2026 "The lichens of the Krkonoše bogs"

… procurement procedure if it confirms that the information contained therein remains correct. 4. In the event of joint procurement by the Contractors, the ESPD shall be submitted by each of the Contractors. These declarations confirm the absence of grounds for exclusion and the fulfilment of the conditions for participation in the procedure to the extent that each of the Contractors demonstrates compliance with the conditions for participation in the procedure. 5. Where an economic operator relies on the resources of other entities to demonstrate compliance with the conditions for participation and to demonstrate the absence of grounds for exclusion in the procedure, it shall submit the ESPD relating to those entities to the extent that it relies on their resources, the ESPD should be completed to the extent that the economic operator uses the resources of another entity and the economic operator submits declarations and documents relating to the grounds for exclusion. 6. As regards the ‘Part IV Selection criteria’ of the ESPD, the Contractor may confine himself to completing the alpha section of the General Declaration on all Selection Criteria, in which case the Contractor shall not complete any of the other sections (A-D) of Part IV of the ESPD. 7. In order to confirm the absence of grounds for exclusion of the Contractor from participation in the procedure and to confirm compliance with the conditions for participation in the procedure ,, the Contracting Authority shall, within a specified period, not shorter than 10 days from the date of the request, call on the Contractor whose tender was the highest rated to submit subjective evidence up to the date of their submission. Details in the SWZ. 8. The Contractor who is subject to the circumstances referred to in Article 5k of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine shall also be excluded from the procurement procedure. 9. At the request of the Ordering Party, the Contractor is obliged to submit the subjective means of proof referred to in §2 sec. 1 points 1)-2) and 6)-7) of the MRPiT Regulation of 23.12.2020 on subjective evidence and other documents or statements that the contracting authority may request from the contractor regarding the grounds for exclusion from the procedure indicated by the contracting authority in this notice. 10. If the Contractor has its registered office or place of residence outside the Republic of Poland, it is obliged to submit the subjective means of proof referred to in §4 of the Regulation referred to in point. 9 above. 11. If the Contractor relies on the capacities or situation of entities providing resources, he is obliged to submit personal means of proof concerning these entities in accordance with §5 of the Regulation referred to in point. 7 above. 12. The contracting authority does not provide for the possibility of awarding the contracts referred to in Article 214(1)(b) CTMR. 1 point 7) of the Public Procurement Act. 13. The contracting authority provides for the possibility of cancelling the procurement procedure on the basis of Article 257 of the Public Procurement Act. 14. For the contract in question, the Contracting Authority did not carry out preliminary market consultations before initiating the procedure. The subject of the contract is lichens of the Krkonoše bogs. The subject matter of the contract consists of the following activities: I. Sampling – fouling backs. II. Analyses of morphs