Collection, transport and management of waste with code 15 01 10* up to 250 Mg

… solutions equivalent to those described in the wording of the ToR. Whenever a standard is referred to in this or the annexes to the ToR, it must be assumed that the words ‘or equivalent’ are used to refer to it. In all places of the ToR and annexes to the ToR where an example of a trademark, patent, origin, source or specific process characterising the products or services provided by a particular Contractor is used, or where the Contracting Authority has described the subject-matter of the contract by reference to the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 1 point 2) and par. 3 PHP, and in any case, acting in accordance with Art. 6 and Article 101(1) CTMR 4 PZP, the Contracting Authority accepts solutions equivalent to those specified in the ToR and in the annexes to the ToR, marking such indications or references with the words ‘or equivalent’ or ‘or equivalent ,’, as appropriate, provided that parameters not inferior to those specified in the description of the subject-matter of the contract are ensured. An equivalent solution is also permissible if the word ‘equivalent’ or ‘equivalent’ is not included in the description of the subject-matter of the contract. Equivalence consists in the possibility of offering the subject of the contract with not inferior technical parameters, configurations, normative, functional requirements, etc. In the detailed description of the subject of the contract, some manufacturer-specific dimensions may be given. The names of the manufacturers of materials and equipment given in the detailed description shall be understood as the preferred type for determining the minimum quality requirements. They are non-binding and equivalent elements may be provided that have at least the same or better standards, technical parameters; qualitative, functional, will be the same thematically and with the same purpose and will not lower the standards specified in the description of the subject of the contract. All ‘products from specific manufacturers shall specify the minimum quality parameters and performance characteristics to be met by the goods in order to meet the requirements set by the Ordering Party and shall constitute only a quality standard for the subject-matter of the contract. By recording the minimum requirements of quality parameters, the Ordering Party understands the requirements of goods contained in generally available sources, catalogues, manufacturers' websites. The use of exemplary manufacturer names is only aimed at clarifying the level of expectations of the Ordering Party in relation to a specific solution. Thus, the use of producer/product/names is purely illustrative. The contracting authority, when describing the subject of the contract, indicating the designation of a specific manufacturer (supplier) or a specific product, simultaneously allows equivalent products with quality parameters and performance characteristics, at least at the level of the parameters of the indicated product, thus recognizing each product with the indicated parameters or better. In such a situation, the Ordering Party requires the submission of relevant documents with the offer, confirming these materials or devices. They will be evaluated during the examination of the tender. The Contracting Authority shall oblige Contractors to