"Supply of biometric readers (fingerprints) and document readers"

… ICT product the type of which is specified in the decision recognising the provider as a high-risk provider referred to in Article 67b(b). 15 of the Act on the Code of Civil Procedure, nor the ICT services or ICT process specified in this decision. 2. If the Contractor offers ICT devices, he is obliged to unambiguously identify in the table of the tender form - each ICT device offered, in particular by indicating: a) the name of the solution, manufacturer or supplier, b) the type, model, version or other designation allowing its identification, c) the series or product line, d) the proposed software, code or license name version of the operating system or firmware, e) the function performed in the performance of the contract, etc., 9. The lack of unambiguous identification of the ICT device offered shall be borne by the Contractor. 3. If it appears from the content of the tender, the documents submitted with the tender or the contractor’s explanations that the tender includes equipment: a) included in the recommendation referred to in Art. 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure Act, b) indicated in the decision on recognition as a high-risk supplier, as provided for in Article 67b para. 15 and 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure Act (it is sufficient to indicate the ICT product, ICT service or ICT process in the decision, but it is not necessary to recognize the contractor itself as a high-risk supplier), the offer will be subject to rejection pursuant to Art. 1 point 17 or point 19 of the Public Procurement Act Whenever trade marks, patents or origins, sources or specific processes, as well as standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems are used in the content of the tender specifications, including in the description of the subject matter of the contract, the Contracting Authority shall accept a solution equivalent to that described. Equivalent product for the specified subject of the contract means a product with the parameters of minimum requirements specified (listed) and specified in the detailed scope, description of the subject of the contract contained in Annex 3 to the tender specification. The Ordering Party allows the submission of materials, goods or equivalent solutions, and any goods specified in the documentation, originating from specific manufacturers, specify the minimum quality parameters and functional characteristics that the goods must meet in order to meet the requirements set by the Ordering Party and constitute only a quality standard of the subject of the contract. By recording the minimum requirements of quality parameters, the Ordering Party understands the requirements of goods contained in generally available sources, catalogues, manufacturers' websites. Operating with exemplary manufacturer's names is only aimed at clarifying the level of the Ordering Party's expectations in relation to a specific solution. The Ordering Party, when describing the subject of the contract, indicating the designation of a specific manufacturer (supplier) or a specific product, simultaneously allows equivalent products with quality parameters and performance characteristics, at least at the level of the parameters of the indicated product, thus recognizing each product with the indicated parameters or better. The use of producer/product names is purely illustrative. By an equivalent quality standard it understands