Construction of a Biocenotic Garden in the City of Ząbki entitled "Little Homeland"

… agreement No FEMA.02.07-IP.01-02EM/24-00. 3. The scope of the contract includes the performance of, among others, the following works: 1) execution of construction works on the basis of documentation and building permit, 2) handing over to the Ordering Party the correctly executed subject of the contract in full, 3) completing and handing over to the Ordering Party as-built documentation, as well as other documents subject to transfer, as well as warranty documents, 4) informing about the completion of the construction along with obtaining a certificate of non-objection. 4. Requirements with regard to the manner of execution and acceptance of works are set out in: – design documentation – Annex 1a to the ToR, – bills of quantities – Annex 1b to the ToR, – Technical Specifications for the Execution and Acceptance of Construction Works – Annex 1c to the ToR. 5. Principles of equivalence of solutions: Where producer names, trade marks, standards, approvals and reference systems appear in the wording of the tender specification, products may be replaced by equivalent ones. The Ordering Party shall consider as equivalent solutions solutions solutions that allow to achieve the effect assumed by the Ordering Party by means of other technical solutions. Equivalent solutions cannot be considered as identical solutions, but only those that in the compared features indicate exactly the same or very similar value in use. By indicating the manufacturer's names, trademarks, standards, approvals or reference systems, the Ordering Party aimed to determine the minimum quality parameters and performance characteristics that goods must meet in order to meet the requirements set by the Ordering Party and constitute only a quality standard of the subject of the contract. By the provision concerning the minimum requirements of quality parameters, the Ordering Party understands the requirements of goods contained in generally available sources, catalogues, manufacturers' websites, etc. Operating with exemplary manufacturer's names is only aimed at clarifying the level of the Ordering Party's expectations in relation to a specific solution. By describing the subject of the contract using specific standards, approvals or technical specifications and reference systems referred to in Art. 1-3 of the Act, pursuant to Art. 4 of the Act allows solutions equivalent to those described. Pursuant to Article 101(1) CTMR, 5 of the Act – The contracting authority may not reject a tender on the sole ground that the works offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject-matter of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the means of proof concerned, that the solutions proposed satisfy in an equivalent manner the requirements set out in the description of the subject-matter of the contract.