How to bid in this country: portals, deadlines, thresholds →
QVMB26-4355 Framework agreement for generating induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and editing the genome, including genetic modifications based on CRISPR technology.
QVMB26-4355 Raamovereenkomst voor het genereren van geïnduceerde pluripotente stamcellen (iPSC's) en het bewerken van het genoom, inclusief genetische modificaties op basis van CRISPR-technologie. — original title
Your path to submission
- Deadline for requests to participate: 3 November at 11:00 — 2 days left. Two-stage procedure: by this deadline you submit a request to participate (proof of eligibility). Only shortlisted firms are then invited to submit a tender.
- You submit on BDA / e-Procurement Belgium — not here and not by e-mail. ↗
- Collect your evidence — the eligibility requirements are listed on this page; for many of them the analysis explains how to obtain them.
Contract
Type of service
Tender documents at a glance
The essentials of the tender documents, checked statement by statement against the documents. For your bid, the original documents count.
Powered by eBriefing – EU language technology. Friedrich is an independent service, not an EU offering.
✓ found in the documents · ❓ not found in the documents or general statement
Tender documents for KU Leuven iPSC/CRISPR framework agreement
The input text concerns a Belgian public procurement procedure launched by KU Leuven (Directie Technische Diensten) for a services “raamovereenkomst” (framework agreement) relating to the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and genome editing using CRISPR technology.
The country context is Belgium (references to KU Leuven, Belgian social security and immigration rules, Belgian company and VAT numbers), with an EU dimension via references to EU Member States’ social security legislation and the European Economic Area.
The excerpts are mainly from the offer form (“OFFERTEFORMULIER”) and a standard commitment form for subcontractors/other entities (“VERBINTENIS TERBESCHIKKINGSTELLING MIDDELEN”), plus the cover page of the “bestek” (specifications), which is said to be 19 pages long but not reproduced in detail.
The text explains what the bidder must submit in formal terms.
Such as: the OFFERTEFORMULIER must be completed with the identity of the tenderer (natural person, company, or combination without legal personality), the reference of the offer, prices (excl./incl. VAT) for “Maximum lijn” and “Minimum lijn” for generation of patient-derived iPSC lines, and the required “optional Quality Control-pakket.” Bidders must also specify “Overige kosten,” the “uitvoeringstermijn,” and description of after‑sales service.
General company information must be provided, such as enterprise number (ondernemingsnummer), social security number (RSZ-nummer), VAT number, IBAN/BIC and beneficiary name, and whether the enterprise qualifies as a SME (KMO) with up to 250 employees.
Where subcontractors are used, the bidder must indicate whether subcontractors will be engaged (JA/NEE), describe the portion of the contract to be subcontracted, and list the proposed subcontractors.
If the bidder relies on the capacity of third parties for qualitative selection, the form requires identification of those entities, the portion of the contract linked to their capacity, and supporting documents, complemented by the separate “Verbintenis terbeschikkingstelling middelen” form signed by those entities.
The bidder must also provide an inventory of all attached documents and proof of signing authority (statutes, powers of attorney, etc.).
The scope of the contract is only described at a high level in the available text.
Such as: the framework agreement covers “diensten” for generating iPSC lines from patient material and performing genome editing, including CRISPR-based genetic modifications.
However, the detailed quantities, place of performance, and period are not specified in these excerpts; the contract is governed by “Besteknr.
Show all 31 statements
TD/120673/VEE‑vek,” which is said to comprise 19 pages.
The bidder has to acknowledge receipt of the full bestek and agree to execute the assignment according to its provisions, annexes, and the unit/global prices and quantities in the inventory.
The place of performance is indirectly indicated through KU Leuven Directie Technische Diensten, Willem de Croylaan 60A, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium, but operational locations, detailed volumes (e.g. number of lines per year), and contract duration are presumably set out in the missing parts of the bestek and are not available in the input.
Regarding award criteria and weighting, the provided text does not state any explicit criteria or their relative weights.
Such as: there is no mention of price vs. quality scoring, technical value, delivery time, or service criteria in the excerpts.
It only notes that the procedure is a “vereenvoudigde onderhandelingsprocedure met voorafgaande bekendmaking,” which implies negotiated procedure under Belgian/EU rules, but the actual evaluation method is presumably defined in the unquoted pages of the bestek.
Consequently, based on the current input, one cannot specify the award criteria, weighting, or any formula used to rank bids.
The documents mention several risks and special conditions from a compliance and formalities perspective.
Such as: the bidder must declare no illegal employment of third-country nationals (derdelanders) and no unauthorised self‑employment in Belgium, and state whether staff are subject to another EU Member State’s social security legislation.
The bidder must accept that any conflicting provisions in their own sales conditions are deemed null and void compared to the bestek and general execution rules.
Offers must be submitted electronically via the Belgian e‑Tendering system by the deadline indicated on the e‑Procurement platform and the invitation; they must be electronically signed on the submission report by a duly authorised person, and scanned signatures are explicitly invalid.
In case of a consortium, each member must sign electronically.
The bidder must indicate a correspondence address and contact details for all award and execution communications.
The text does not mention penalties for late delivery, performance guarantees, validity period of offers, question deadlines, or mandatory site visits; these would normally be in the full bestek, but they are not part of the provided excerpt.
On contradictions or corrections, the visible text is largely repetitive and consistent across versions of the offer form and subcontractor commitment form.
Such as: the bestek number appears as TD/120673/VEE‑vek on the forms and TD/120673NEE‑vek on the cover page, which is likely a typographical variant rather than a substantive contradiction; the dossier number QVMB 26‑4355 is consistent.
The offer form states that the bestek is 19 pages, and this statement is repeated verbatim in multiple occurrences, so there is no conflict about its length.
Where any discrepancy might exist between a bidder’s own terms and the bestek, the documents clearly state that the bestek and general execution rules prevail, and any conflicting sales conditions of the bidder are considered null and not written.
No other internal contradictions (e.g. different scopes, different submission rules) are evident in the text provided.
Only the contracting authority's tender documents are binding. As of: 25/10/2026
How often this buyer tenders this kind of work
Tactics
When contracts were awarded in this country and sector, usually 6 or more bids came in. Many compete here — price and references decide. (Based on 893 completed awards — not a statement about this procedure.)
This procedure allows 25 days between publication and deadline — typical in this country is 34 (median of 3,233 procedures). Much tighter than usual: the first week counts.
Foreign bidders
In Belgium · R&D services, 542 contracts went to foreign companies over the last 3 years (of 1,152 recorded awards) — mostly from Germany, France, Italy.
How to bid
Don't miss the next one
Friedrich finds tenders like this for you — every morning at 7:30, each one checked by Claude (Anthropic) for fit, and he learns from your feedback what your company really does.
Register now