Електроразпределение Юг ЕАД

Clement What the numbers say about this buyer

• 70% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (1,950 awards since 2017, spread over 282 companies). That is well above the national norm (58%) — newcomers have a harder time here than elsewhere.n = 1,950 awards since 2017
• The median procedure drew 3 bids (1,624 procedures with a bid count); 19% ended with a single bidder. Country: median 1.9 bids.n = 1,624
• The award came in at a median 80% of the estimated value (337 awards with both estimate and value) — pricing at the estimate is usually too high here. Country: 72%.n = 337
• 1% of the bids received came from small and medium-sized enterprises (293 procedures with a bid mix). Country: 16%.n = 293
• 10% of awards went to companies from abroad (1,950 awards with a known winner country). National average: 6%.n = 1,950
• Across 29 procedures with structured selection criteria, this buyer most often required: Independent quality certificate (e.g. ISO 9001) (11 of 29), Minimum annual turnover (8 of 29), Staff qualifications (8 of 29), Professional liability insurance (4 of 29).n = 29
• < 1% of the bids received came from other countries (293 procedures with a bid mix) — all bidders, not just the winners. Country: 0%.n = 293

From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 07/10/2026.