Supply of mobile tablets for digital signature handling for Copernicus PL Sp. z o.o.
„Dostawa tabletów mobilnych do obsługi podpisów cyfrowych dla Copernicus PL Sp. z o.o.”
Poland · GDAŃSK · how to bid here →
Your path to submission
- Deadline: 29 October at 10:00 — 26 days left.
- The submission point is stated in the notice (link on the right).
- Offer and evidence in: POL, POL.
- Collect your evidence — the eligibility requirements are listed above; for many of them the analysis explains how to obtain them.
Clement What the numbers say about this buyer
- 41% of the bids received came from small and medium-sized enterprises (382 procedures with a bid mix). Sector: 94%.n = 382
- 45% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (2,290 awards since 2015, spread over 813 companies). 55% went to new names.n = 2,290 awards since 2015
- 9% of awards went to companies from abroad (2,290 awards with a known winner country). Sector average: 0%.n = 2,290
- The award came in at a median 98% of the estimated value (38 awards with both estimate and value) — pricing at the estimate is usually about right here. Sector: 91%.n = 38
- The median procedure drew 3 bids (2,056 procedures with a bid count); 38% ended with a single bidder. Sector: median 3 bids.n = 2,056
From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 01/10/2026.
Foreign bidders
In Poland · Office & computing machinery, 97 contracts went to foreign companies over the last 3 years (of 35,585 recorded awards) — mostly from Germany, France, Spain.
Submission language: POL.
Typical field: median 3 (from 6,321 awards).
What the buyer is looking for
1. The subject of the contract is the supply of mobile tablets to support digital signatures for Copernicus PL Sp. z o.o. 2. The subject of the contract consists of 2 lots. 3. A detailed description of the subject of the contract, quantities and conditions for the execution of the contract are contained in: 1) Annex to the FTZ – Tender Form, 2) Annex 1 to the FTZ – Description of the subject-matter of the contract (OPZ), 3) Annex 3 to the FTZ – Draft contract. 4. Offered items of the order must be complete, of a high standard in terms of both quality and functionality, as well as free from defects in materials, construction and legal. 5. Offered items of the order must be allowed to be marketed and used in accordance with applicable law. 6. In all provisions of the FTZ and its annexes, in which the Ordering Party refers to standards, approvals, technical specifications or reference…
Show full description
… systems or indicates trademarks, parameters or sources of origin (names of manufacturers or devices), in accordance with Art. 5 and Article 101 para. 4 of the PPL Act, the Employer allows equivalent solutions. 7. In the case of the assortment defined by trade names, the Ordering Party allows the submission of offers for an equivalent assortment in all respects, i.e. composition, weight, scope, spectrum and duration of operation, form, functions, etc., provided that they guarantee the performance of the subject of the contract in accordance with the assumptions set out in this FTZ. In the case of an equivalent assortment, the Contractor must specify its trade name, catalogue number and manufacturer’s name. It shall be for the Contractor to demonstrate the equivalence of the solution offered or equivalent solutions. 8. The Contracting Authority does not reserve the possibility of applying for the contract only by the Contractors referred to in Article 94 of the Public Procurement Act. 9. The Contracting Authority does not impose the requirements referred to in Article 96 of the Public Procurement Act. 10. The contracting authority requires that the purchased assortment complies with the principle of ‘do no significant harm’ (DNSH). 11. In connection with the performance of the contract, the Ordering Party does not provide for the obligation to personally perform the key tasks of the contract.
Selection criteria — in the procurement documents
The buyer states in the notice that the selection criteria are in the procurement documents (link on the right), not in the EU form. The document analysis below extracts them from there — bid and evidence in Polish.
Contract
Who has won here before
| Company | Awards | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Urtica Sp. z o.o. | 30 | 2024–2026 |
| Aesculap Chifa Sp. z o.o. · 64-300 PL | 29 | 2015–2026 |
| Salus International Sp. z o.o. | 25 | 2015–2026 |
| Medtronic Poland Sp. z o.o. | 25 | 2022–2025 |
| Bialmed Sp. z o.o. | 24 | 2024–2026 |
How often this buyer tenders this
Who knows the rhythm prepares instead of reacting.
How to bid
Guide: how to apply on e-Zamówienia (Polen) → Registration, signature, fees — from the operator's bidder manual.