Friedrich & ClementBETA

Qualification Scheme for Climate credits

Denmark · Kastrup · how to bid here →

Your path to submission

  1. Deadline: 7 June 2034 at 22:00 — 2805 days left.
  2. The submission point is stated in the notice (link on the right).
  3. Offer and evidence in: ENG.
  4. Collect your evidence — use the eligibility analysis above: it lists the requirements and, for known certificates, how to get them.
Compiled automatically from notice and documents — no guarantee; the procedure's wording is binding.

Clement What the numbers say about this buyer

  • 48% of awards went to companies from abroad (21 awards with a known winner country). Sector average: 5%.n = 21
  • 0% of the bids received came from small and medium-sized enterprises (9 procedures with a bid mix). Sector: 70%.n = 9
  • 15% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (21 awards since 2017, spread over 12 companies). 85% went to new names.n = 21 awards since 2017
  • The median procedure drew 3 bids (18 procedures with a bid count); 17% ended with a single bidder. Sector: median 4 bids.n = 18
  • The award came in at a median 95% of the estimated value (9 awards with both estimate and value) — pricing at the estimate is usually too high here. Sector: 92%.n = 9

From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 29/09/2026.

Clement
References and certificates from your home country count fully across the EU — that is what European procurement law is for.

Foreign bidders

In Denmark · Cleaning, environment & waste, 59 contracts went to foreign companies over the last 3 years (of 1,182 recorded awards) — mostly from Germany, Finland, France.

Typical field: median 4 (from 1,092 awards).

Measured from linked award data; foreign winners bidding through a local subsidiary count as domestic — the true share is higher.

What the buyer is looking for

The summary in English is being prepared. The official description below is in the original language (DA).

Show original description (DA)

The Qualification Scheme concerns the supply of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) credits from nature-based, hybrid and engineered CDR solutions including, but not limited to, reforestation, blue carbon, biochar, bioenergy with carbon dioxide capture and storage (BECCS) and direct air carbon dioxide capture and storage (DACCS) for the purpose of offsetting Copenhagen Airports’ residual scope 1, scope 2 and scope 3 category 6 (business travel) emissions in line with applicable Airport Carbon Accreditation carbon offsetting requirements.

Description as published (DA).

What you must prove — eligibility criteria

›
References: supplies
The applicant must meet the following minimum requirements in order to be technically and professionally fit to perform the contract The applicant must have made at least 3 deliveries of goods or services that have been performed within the last 3 years and th… ▸▾
The applicant must meet the following minimum requirements in order to be technically and professionally fit to perform the contract The applicant must have made at least 3 deliveries of goods or services that have been performed within the last 3 years and that are similar to the subject matter of the contract. The references must have been carried out within the last three years from the date on which the application was submitted. The reference requirement can be met through references where the applicant has been a supplier or subcontractor. The decisive factor is that the applicant has performed the work covered by the reference. NOTE. The applicant is permitted to use previous work performed for CPH as a reference, but it is up to the applicant to assess whether this reference is most comparable to the assignment offered. Please note that an applicant can only provide its own references in its own ESPD, i.e. for the legal entity in question (e.g. company). This means, for example, that the references of group companies can only be taken into account if the applicant relies on the group companies in question in relation to suitability, and if a separate ESPD and statement of support are thus submitted for the group companies in question, cf. below. For consortia, the consortium participants must collectively meet the minimum requirement. For applicants who rely on the technical and professional capacities of other economic operators, the applicant and the supporting entity must jointly meet the minimum requirement. Indication of reference and formal requirements for the content of the reference The application may contain a maximum of 3 references. It is the responsibility of the Applicant to select the references that are considered most comparable to the tendered assignment. If more than 3 references are submitted, only the first specified 3 references will be used as a basis for CPH's assessment of the Application. The applicant's references as specified in the eESPD should include the following for the purposes of the suitability assessment and selection assessment: • The reference customer, incl. Contact information • Contract period and time of delivery and commissioning • Description of the reference customer • Description of how the reference is similar to the subject matter of the contract • Scope of delivery • Description of the services provided • The applicant's role in connection with the delivery CPH reserves the right to contact the specified reference customer in order to obtain certification of the information about the reference. CPH encourages the applicant's reference to be described comprehensively but concisely and not exceeding 2400 characters with spaces corresponding to one (1) A4 page. Similarity to the subject-matter of the contract In order to assess whether the references cited are comparable to the subject-matter of the contract tendered, emphasis is placed on the following: In assessing whether the references submitted by The Applicant are comparable to the subject matter of this qualification system, CPH will consider whether the referenced deliveries demonstrate technical and operational characteristics that align with the requirements for supplying ACA-eligible CDR credits. Particular emphasis will be placed on the following aspects of similarity: 1. Delivery of CDR credits that meet the requirements laid out in Section 3.2 of Annex D - ACA Carbon Offsetting Requirements (eligible crediting programs, carbon removal methodologies and project types) 2. Provision of documentation enabling ACA-mandated public reporting, including information concerning crediting programs, project description, volume, vintage, and retirement details, as laid out in Section 4.1.1 of the Annex D - ACA Carbon Offsetting Requirements 3. Whether the referenced delivery involves comparable volumes to those expected under this qualification system. References demonstrating these characteristics will be considered hig
Requirement texts are quoted in the notice's original language — the official wording is binding.

Contract

BuyerKøbenhavns Lufthavne A/S
TypeServices
Estimated valuevalue not published
Published9 June 2026
CategoryCleaning, environment & waste · CPV 90731210

Who has won here before

CompanyAwardsPeriod
If Skadeforsikring, filial af If Skadeförsäkring AB32025–2026
Rambøll Danmark A/S · 2830 DK22026
Tryg Forsikring A/S12025
Sweco Danmark A/S12026
SiteHub12026
From 17.9M documented awards · regular winners know this buyer's requirements — that is your competition.
·
days until the deadline — Wednesday, 7 June 2034 at 22:00

How to bid

Read the full notice — Original + documents
Goes directly to this tender on TED — Tenders Electronic Daily. The full specification and all annexes are there.
Friedrich finds tenders like this for you — every morning at 7:30, and he learns from your feedback.
Register now →
Qualification Scheme for Climate credits — Friedrich & Clement