ZV-GL-26-1152000-4121.06 Purchase of a rinsing container for the state accommodation Seeth

Such as in the “Angebotsaufforderung” and Bieterfragen, the scope of the contract is described as a turnkey delivery and installation of a 6‑m dishwashing container with band dishwasher, water treatment, grease separator, lifting unit, including relocation of existing cooling containers, all connection works, commissioning, functional testing, documentation, DGUV‑compliant electrical test protocols and staff training. The place of performance is the Landesunterkunft Seeth in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. The time frame is clarified in the Q&A: execution period 01.02.–14.02.2027, with the container required to be fully operational by 14.02.2027, and handover/inbetriebnahme possibly on 15.02.2027. The contract type is a single lot (no lot-wise award); variants and multiple bids are not permitted; offers must be submitted electronically via the RIB e‑Vergabe platform by 16.11.2026, 08:30, and must remain binding for 45 days, with questions to be asked only in text form via e‑Vergabesystem/e‑mail by 09.11.2026, 23:59.

Such as in the sections on “Angebotswertung”, “Zuschlagskriterien” and the TED notice, the award criteria are purely price-based: the Zuschlagskriterium is “Preis” with a weighting of 100 %. The economically most advantageous tender is defined as the lowest net total price according to the price sheet (Gesamtsumme netto), with the evaluation price derived from the recalculated offer sum including unconditional percentage discounts noted in the designated field. There are no qualitative or technical scoring criteria; however, technical suitability is ensured via mandatory data sheets and minimum requirements in the specifications. Performance-related documents that affect economic evaluation cannot be requested after the deadline; only non-essential price items may be clarified if they do not change total price or ranking.

Such as in the “Zusätzliche Vertragsbedingungen”, Bieterfragen and Bewerbungsbedingungen, the documents outline key risks and special conditions: VOL/B (2003) plus GM.SH “Zusätzliche Allgemeine Vertragsbedingungen” are binding, and any bidder AGB lead to exclusion. There are explicit anti‑corruption and anti‑cartel clauses with contractual penalties (5 % of settlement sum for corruption-related offences, 15 % for proven anti-competitive agreements) and rights of termination under § 314 BGB. The 14.02.2027 completion date is a binding contractual deadline; while no liquidated damages are set, statutory delay rules apply, including possible compensation for documented extra costs such as disposable tableware. The authority may adjust the deadline reasonably if delays are attributable to itself, but not simply because of supplier lead times (these remain bidder risk). Subcontracting is regulated via the Verzeichnis der Unterauftragnehmerleistungen and mandatory commitment declarations; “pure suppliers” of standard components without on-site work are not treated as subcontractors (Q&A), whereas suppliers whose staff perform on‑site tasks (e.g. installation, commissioning, training) must be declared as Unterauftragnehmer. E‑invoicing in xRechnung format is mandatory, payments are electronic, and overpayments must be repaid with high default interest. No site visit is mentioned as required or offered.

Such as in the corrections found in the Bieterfragen, contradictions are explicitly resolved within the documents. For example, the initial specification mentioning “Mitte Februar 2026” for readiness is contradicted by the TED notice indicating performance in February 2027; the Q&A clarify that the binding requirement is readiness by 14.02.2027 (with handover by 15.02.2027). Another potential contradiction between Bewerbungsbedingungen (generic rules for Nebenangebote) and the Angebotsaufforderung (which states Nebenangebote sind nicht zugelassen) is resolved by the specific statement in the Aufforderung: for this procedure, alternative bids are not allowed, so the general Nebenangebote rules do not apply. Similarly, while the generic offer conditions mention possible paper or electronic submission options, the TED notice and instructions for electronic submission make clear that here only electronic submission via RIB is permitted; paper offers are invalid. Where discrepancies exist, the specific provisions in the Aufforderung, TED notice and Bieterfragen/Antworten for this tender prevail over generic template text.