Successive delivery of sanitary materials for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – State Research Institute Branch in Gliwice

… accompanied by the words ‘or equivalent’. An equivalent return means that the Ordering Party allows products or services that meet the minimum quality, performance and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements indicated by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at the level required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not impair the quality of the results achieved or impair the proper use or functioning of the product or service in accordance with its intended purpose. If the Contractor proposes in the offer products or services equivalent in quality to those indicated by the Ordering Party, the Contractor is obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party, by submitting the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Public Procurement Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 2) Where the description of the subject-matter of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 1 point 2 and paragraph. 3 of the Public Procurement Act, the Contracting Authority allows solutions equivalent to those described, and such reference is accompanied by the words ‘or equivalent’. The Contractor who offers solutions equivalent to the indicated standards is obliged to demonstrate in the tender that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements specified by the Ordering Party, by indicating in the tender form a standard equivalent to the product offered and attaching to the tender the relevant means of evidence referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Public Procurement Act, proving that the proposed solutions to the standards meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 3) If the Contractor does not submit the evidence in question or the submitted evidence is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the tender to the extent described in the description of the subject of the contract), the Contracting Authority will not call for their submission / supplementation. All costs and activities related to the confirmation of compliance by the tender with equivalent quality parameters shall be borne by the Contractor.