Friedrich & ClementBETA

E-voting system code audit

E-hääletuse süsteemi koodiaudit

Estonia · Tallinn · how to bid here →

Your path to submission

  1. Deadline: 29 October at 13:00 — 26 days left.
  2. The submission point is stated in the notice (link on the right).
  3. Offer and evidence in: EST.
  4. Collect your evidence — the eligibility requirements are listed above; for many of them the analysis explains how to obtain them.
Compiled automatically from notice and documents — no guarantee; the procedure's wording is binding.

Clement What the numbers say about this buyer

  • In this sector the buyer awards roughly every 2 months (83 awards, most recently August 2026) — the next award is due around October 2026 by that rhythm. The last award went to FOB Solutions OÜ.n = 83
  • 19% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (204 awards since 2018, spread over 73 companies). That is well below the sector norm (42%) — this buyer switches suppliers more often than others.n = 204 awards since 2018
  • The median procedure drew 3 bids (189 procedures with a bid count); 32% ended with a single bidder. Sector: median 6 bids.n = 189
  • 10% of the bids received came from other countries (107 procedures with a bid mix) — all bidders, not just the winners. Sector: 17%.n = 107
  • 99% of the bids received came from small and medium-sized enterprises (107 procedures with a bid mix). Sector: 88%.n = 107

From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 27/09/2026.

Clement
References and certificates from your home country count fully across the EU — that is what European procurement law is for.
Anything unclear? Bidder questions are your right — ask in writing, the answer goes to everyone.

Foreign bidders

In Estonia · IT services, 106 contracts went to foreign companies over the last 3 years (of 1,200 recorded awards) — mostly from Finland, Germany, Belgium.

Submission language: EST.

Typical field: median 16 (from 83 awards).

Measured from linked award data; foreign winners bidding through a local subsidiary count as domestic — the true share is higher.

What the buyer is looking for

The purpose of an e-voting system (EHS) code audit is to obtain sufficient assurance as to the quality of the code that the code has been written using best practices and is suitable for publication. In addition, we want to be assured that the application does what the functional requirements are – according to the documentation. / Grounds for exclusion and selection criteria: See procurement documents

Machine translation (EU eTranslation) — official wording via the PDF link.

Selection criteria — via the ESPD

The buyer states in the notice that eligibility is proven through the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD); the concrete requirements are in the tender documents. The document analysis below extracts them from there — bid and evidence in Estonian.

Contract

BuyerRiigi Infosüsteemi Amet
TypeServices
Estimated value155.000 €
Published29 September 2026
CategoryIT services · CPV 72225000

Who has won here before

CompanyAwardsPeriod
Trinidad Wiseman OÜ52024–2026
Kitman Thulema AS52025–2026
FINEST AS52025–2026
Devtailor OÜ42024–2026
Nortal AS42024–2025
From 18.0M documented awards · regular winners know this buyer's requirements — that is your competition.

How often this buyer tenders this

202433
202535
202632

Who knows the rhythm prepares instead of reacting.

·
days until the deadline — Thursday 29 October at 13:00

How to bid

Read the full notice — Original + documents
Goes directly to this tender on TED — Tenders Electronic Daily. The full specification and all annexes are there.

Tender documents — direct download

Specifications and annexes hosted by the buyer — usually accessible without registration.
Friedrich finds tenders like this for you — every morning at 7:30, each one checked by Claude (Anthropic) for fit, and he learns from your feedback what your company really does.
Register now →
E-voting system code audit — Friedrich & Clement