Your path to submission
- Deadline: 15 October at 23:59 — 12 days left.
- The submission point is stated in the notice (link on the right).
- Offer and evidence in: ENG.
- Collect your evidence — use the eligibility analysis above: it lists the requirements and, for known certificates, how to get them.
Compiled automatically from notice and documents — no guarantee; the procedure's wording is binding.
Clement What the numbers say about this buyer
- 61% of awards went to companies from abroad (18 awards with a known winner country). Sector average: 34%.n = 18
- 6% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (18 awards since 2018, spread over 11 companies). That is well below the sector norm (27%) — this buyer switches suppliers more often than others.n = 18 awards since 2018
- The median procedure drew 4 bids (12 procedures with a bid count); 0% ended with a single bidder. Sector: median 5 bids.n = 12
From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 27/09/2026.
ClementReferences and certificates from your home country count fully across the EU — that is what European procurement law is for.
Foreign bidders
In Denmark · Architecture & engineering, 407 contracts went to foreign companies over the last 3 years (of 1,215 recorded awards) — mostly from Germany, Finland, Bulgaria.
Typical field: median 4 (from 7 awards).
Measured from linked award data; foreign winners bidding through a local subsidiary count as domestic — the true share is higher.
What the buyer is looking for
The scope of work covers a comprehensive post‐construction monitoring of bats, seabirds, and migratory birds and collision‐risk assessment of bats and migratory birds for the Natura 2000 Slupsk Bank and the Offshore Windfarms Baltica 2 & 3 located approximately 30 km offshore Poland, including offshore surveys, data analysis, regulatory reporting, and authority liaison to ensure compliance with environmental permit requirements. The base scope of work is expected to be executed in year 2027-2032. For reference, some of the aforementioned scopes are options.
Machine translation (EU eTranslation) — official wording via the PDF link.
What you must prove — eligibility criteria
›References: works
This criterium weighs 80 % in the evaluation. The Applicant is encouraged to provide the following information about the Applicant’s completed experiences within birds & bats monitoring activities in Annex J (Response Form): For each reference, the following i… ▸▾
This criterium weighs 80 % in the evaluation. The Applicant is encouraged to provide the following information about the Applicant’s completed experiences within birds & bats monitoring activities in Annex J (Response Form): For each reference, the following information is requested: • Project name • Project location and country • Description of the Scope of work covered by Applicant incl. used method to deliver on the scope; • Aim of the project (e.g. EIA); • Project period (commencement and completion date incl. indication of seasons) • Name of client (or if confidential, this should be stated) • Approval party (authority, client etc.); A maximum of two (2) references per for each of the following monitoring scopes (seabirds, migratory birds, bats, bird collision, bats collision) can be submitted under the selection criterion “Experience”: • Seabirds • Migratory birds • Bats • Bird collision • Bats collision If more references are submitted, only the most recent references up to the maximum number of references will be considered. The most recent references will be determined based on start date. No additional documentation for the selection criterion for experience will be required from the Applicant. However, the Contracting Entity reserves the right to contact the Applicant or relevant third parties for verification of the information stated in the description(s). Assessment of experience The Applicant’s experience will be based on the information submitted in accordance with Section 3.3.4.1 and will be an overall assessment of a) Similarity to the Contract, including the following elements: - applied method: seabirds (vessel-based monitoring, visual observation, etc.); - migratory birds (radar-based monitoring), band modelling, data processing etc; - bats activity (bats recording, data processing etc.), bats collision; - reporting and data interpretation, seasonal coverage, monitoring program de-scription preparation, work planning etc. - regional bird species detection and observation – present in the Baltic Sea region b) Project commencement time and confirmation of scope being delivered and approved;
›Other economic requirement
This criterium weighs 20 % in the evaluation. The Applicant is encouraged to submit the latest two signed and approved annual reports. The Contracting Entity will assess the annual reports based on the below key financial figures. If the key financial figures … ▸▾
This criterium weighs 20 % in the evaluation. The Applicant is encouraged to submit the latest two signed and approved annual reports. The Contracting Entity will assess the annual reports based on the below key financial figures. If the key financial figures are not stated as described below, the Applicant is encouraged to submit information about the key financial figures below for the latest two audited annual reports as well as submitting the latest two audited annual reports. - Turnover (revenue) - Earnings before tax (EBT) - Current assets - Total assets (sum of all assets) - Total shareholder’s equity (equity including minority shares) - Current liabilities - Intangible assets - Inventories - Trade receivables - Cash and cash equivalents - Trade payables - Total interest-bearing debt (bank loans, draw on revolving credit facilities and corporate bonds) The Applicant is encouraged to use the Annex J (Response Form) for submission of the above financial information. The evaluation of the Applicant’s economic and financial capacity will be based upon the information submitted and will be an assessment of the following three areas (in prioritized order), all for the latest audited annual report unless otherwise mentioned below: (a) Capital structure, in prioritized order (but where the two items marked with a * have equal priority) consisting of: Estimated contract value to equity, Solvency ratio, (equity / total assets), Change of Tangible Net Worth, (equity less intangible assets) (based on both audited annual reports) and Debt to equity* Debt to earnings* (b) Liquidity, in prioritized order (but where the two items marked with a * have equal priori-ty) consisting of: Current ratio (current assets / current liabilities) Average working capital turnover (Turnover (Revenue)/Average working capital) (working capital calculated as the sum of inventories, trade receivables and cash and cash equivalents, subtracting trade payables) (based on both audited annual reports)* Current ratio (the oldest of the two latest audited annual reports)* (c) Profitability. (The two criteria have equal priority) : Earnings before tax to total assets, Earnings before tax margin (Earnings before tax (EBT) / Turnover (revenue) (based on both audited annual reports).
Requirement texts are quoted in the notice's original language — the official wording is binding.
Contract
BuyerØrsted Wind Power A/S
TypeServices
Estimated value26.300.000 €
Published16 September 2026
CategoryArchitecture & engineering · CPV 71313450
Who has won here before
| Company | Awards | Period |
|---|
| Swire Renewable Energy A/S | 2 | 2023–2024 |
| High Speed Transfers Limited | 1 | 2024 |
| UTM Consultants Ltd | 1 | 2024 |
| Atlas Services Group Energy Ltd · Bristol | 1 | 2024 |
| Specialist Marine Consultants Ltd | 1 | 2024 |
From 18.0M documented awards · regular winners know this buyer's requirements — that is your competition.
How often this buyer tenders this
Who knows the rhythm prepares instead of reacting.