The European procurement market in measured figures.
Every statement on this page stands on its own: subject, figure, method and collection date in a single sentence. It is meant to be quoted — individually, and without the rest of the page. What the figures do not support is set out at the end under methodology. The corpus behind them: /en/data.
1 · Scope of the collection
What was actually counted at this point in time — not what the market comprises in total.
On 21 August 2026, the Friedrich & Clement corpus held 93,519 public procurement procedures whose submission deadline had not yet passed. They are spread across 27 countries and come from 60 source portals. (Own collection, counted in our own corpus.)
Of these open procedures, 25,039 fall below the EU thresholds and are therefore not published on TED — 26.8 % of the open stock. They come from 16 countries in which we read below-threshold notices directly from the national source.
The historical corpus from which this snapshot is drawn holds 19.4M notices since 2002, of which 10.4M are below threshold, together with 13.7M award decisions naming a winner and 1.7M companies. It is assembled from 73 national procurement portals and TED.
2 · Below-threshold procurement in Germany
The part of the market that carries no EU-wide publication duty and is therefore held complete in no European register.
In Germany, 5,472 below-threshold procurement procedures were open on 21 August 2026 that are not published on TED. They are spread across 8 portal families. That is 20.6 % of all 26,506 procedures open in Germany at that moment. (Own collection from 73 source portals.)
Breakdown of the 5,472 open below-threshold procedures in Germany by portal family on 21 August 2026:
| Portal family | Open procedures | Share |
|---|---|---|
| cosinex-Vergabemarktplätze (DTVP, Brandenburg, Rheinland-Pfalz, Niedersachsen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern) | 2,314 | 42.3 % |
| service.bund.de | 1,307 | 23.9 % |
| evergabe.NRW | 524 | 9.6 % |
| oeffentlichevergabe.de | 494 | 9 % |
| meinauftrag.rib.de (Berlin, Bayern Staatsbau, GMSH Schleswig-Holstein, Kommunen) | 385 | 7 % |
| HAD — Hessische Ausschreibungsdatenbank | 265 | 4.8 % |
| AI Vergabeplattform (Sachsen, Bremen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Saarland) | 95 | 1.7 % |
| evergabe-online.de (Thüringen) | 88 | 1.6 % |
A procedure counts as below threshold when its estimated contract value falls under the EU thresholds. Since 1 January 2026 these are, for classical contracting authorities, €5,404,000 for works contracts, €216,000 for supply and service contracts and €140,000 where a central government authority procures; for utilities €432,000, and for social and other specific services €750,000. All values are net of VAT and are reset every two years.
Below these values there is no EU-wide duty to publish. Such procedures do not appear on TED but — where they are made public at all — on national, regional or municipal portals.
Germany is therefore, on 21 August 2026, the country with the most open below-threshold procedures in the corpus. The full ranking of the 16 countries in which we read below threshold:
| Country | Open below-threshold procedures |
|---|---|
| Germany | 5,472 |
| Spain | 4,476 |
| Greece | 3,839 |
| Poland | 3,561 |
| France | 3,492 |
| Belgium | 1,244 |
| Italy | 909 |
| Bulgaria | 421 |
| Finland | 363 |
| Estonia | 272 |
| Latvia | 254 |
| Netherlands | 188 |
| Slovakia | 182 |
| Hungary | 182 |
| Ireland | 113 |
| Romania | 71 |
3 · Bidding window per country
The time between publication of a notice and the submission deadline — the figure that decides whether a bid can be written at all.
The time between publication and submission deadline differs more than fourfold between EU countries: the median ranges from 18 days (Poland) to 73 days (Netherlands). Measured across 82,305 open procedures carrying both a publication date and a deadline, collected on 21 August 2026.
Germany sits mid-field with a median of 33 days; half of German procedures fall between 30 and 39 days.
Median and interquartile range of the bidding window per country, in days, measured across open procedures carrying a publication date and a deadline:
| Country | Median (days) | Lower quartile | Upper quartile | Procedures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poland | 18 | 15 | 32 | 7,860 |
| Greece | 19 | 8 | 37 | 5,673 |
| Portugal | 28 | 28 | 32 | 623 |
| Latvia | 29 | 18 | 32 | 1,157 |
| Slovakia | 29 | 19 | 33 | 652 |
| Hungary | 29 | 20 | 33 | 764 |
| Bulgaria | 30 | 22 | 34 | 1,825 |
| Croatia | 30 | 22 | 34 | 501 |
| Estonia | 31 | 19 | 36 | 729 |
| Spain | 31 | 21 | 42 | 8,502 |
| Ireland | 31 | 28 | 35 | 569 |
| Slovenia | 31 | 28 | 34 | 367 |
| Austria | 33 | 29 | 39 | 382 |
| Germany | 33 | 30 | 39 | 20,544 |
| Czechia | 33 | 30 | 35 | 1,380 |
| Lithuania | 34 | 31 | 35 | 539 |
| Finland | 35 | 28 | 60 | 675 |
| Romania | 35 | 32 | 39 | 1,847 |
| Italy | 42 | 34 | 53 | 4,913 |
| Denmark | 44 | 32 | 60 | 314 |
| Belgium | 46 | 34 | 61 | 3,317 |
| France | 51 | 40 | 62 | 15,092 |
| Sweden | 54 | 32 | 69 | 1,026 |
| Netherlands | 73 | 56 | 90 | 3,054 |
These medians are measured on the procedures open right now, not on all ever published. A snapshot of open procedures contains long deadlines systematically more often than short ones, because a procedure with a 90-day window stays visible three times as long as one with 30 days. The values should therefore be read as an upper estimate of actual deadline length; the comparison between countries is unaffected, because the effect hits every country alike. Procedures with a window longer than 200 days are excluded — those are framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems, not single tenders.
4 · Distribution of submission deadlines across weekdays
When deadlines actually fall — and how unevenly they spread across the week.
Monday is the most common deadline day in European public procurement: 28.8 % of all 93,685 open procedures close on a Monday, against 20 % under an even spread across the working week. Collected on 21 August 2026.
96.9 % of all deadlines fall on a weekday from Monday to Friday; Saturday and Sunday together account for 3.1 %.
| Deadline day | Open procedures | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Monday | 26,965 | 28.8 % |
| Tuesday | 19,348 | 20.7 % |
| Wednesday | 13,528 | 14.4 % |
| Thursday | 14,347 | 15.3 % |
| Friday | 16,606 | 17.7 % |
| Saturday | 1,441 | 1.5 % |
| Sunday | 1,450 | 1.5 % |
Of the 93,685 open procedures, 53,792 carry a genuine clock time in the deadline field (57.4 %); for the remainder no time of day is recorded. Among those carrying a time, 30,430 close before 12:00 — 56.6 %. The share is computed exclusively over procedures with a recorded time; without that restriction, procedures without a time would have entered the denominator as midnight and distorted the figure.
5 · Demand for management-system certificates
In how many open procedures a given certificate is required as proof of suitability.
ISO 9001 is the most frequently required certificate: on 21 August 2026, 1,427 open procurement procedures in Europe demanded proof to ISO 9001, 395 of them in Germany. The reference base is the 36,768 open procedures for which structured selection criteria are available — not all open procedures.
ISO 14001 (environmental management) is required in 638 open procedures, ISO 27001 (information security) in 58. What is notable about the latter is its distribution: 40 of the 58 procedures requiring ISO 27001 are German — 69 %, against a German share of 28.3 % of the open stock overall.
| Certificate | Open procedures (Europe) | of which Germany | Share of procedures with criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 | 1,427 | 395 | 3.9 % |
| ISO 14001 | 638 | 102 | 1.7 % |
| ISO 27001 | 58 | 40 | 0.2 % |
| ISO 45001 | 18 | 6 | 0 % |
| SCC | 1 | 1 | 0 % |
| EMAS | 569 | 61 | 1.5 % |
The reference base for these figures is the 36,768 open procedures for which structured selection criteria are available — not the 93,519 open procedures in total. Structured criteria come essentially from TED; for below-threshold procedures they are largely unavailable. The figures given are therefore lower bounds on actual demand: a certificate demanded in the running text of a notice, without a structured criterion behind it, is not counted here.
6 · Methodology — and what these figures do not mean
A figure without its limits is an assertion. Both are set out here.
How the measurement works
- Counting, not projection. Every figure on this page is a count within our own corpus. Nothing is estimated, extrapolated or grossed up from samples.
- Two collection times. Corpus figures (sections 1 and 2) are counted when the page is served and refreshed hourly; market patterns (sections 3 to 5) come from a nightly measurement. Both timestamps appear beneath each statement.
- A read model is queried, never the write tables. The page queries an aggregate rebuilt nightly. Because deadlines expire between two rebuilds, every query additionally filters on a deadline in the future — expired procedures are not counted.
- “Open” means: the submission deadline has not passed. Procedures without a recorded deadline appear in no figure on this page.
- Below threshold means: flagged as such, or classified as such. For Germany, Poland and the Netherlands the attribute comes from the legal basis or procedural regime of the source (UVgO, VOB/A, isBelowEU, europees) — there it is a statement by the contracting authority, not a calculation of ours. For Italy, Spain, Estonia and Slovakia the estimated contract value is compared against the EU thresholds. Procedures without a stated value stay unflagged and count in neither direction.
What these figures do not mean
- They are lower bounds, not a full census of the market. No member state holds a complete central register of below-threshold procurement. Municipalities may publish on portals we do not read or — depending on value limits and regional law — not publish at all. The 5,472 German procedures are what actually stood on 8 readable portal families on 21 August 2026. The true figure is higher; by how much is unknown.
- Two federal states are missing as their own source. For Hamburg and Saxony-Anhalt no machine-readable portal has been opened up so far. Procedures from those states appear only insofar as their contracting authorities publish via one of the nationwide portals.
- A known deviation in value-based classification. The value-based classification for Italy, Spain, Estonia and Slovakia currently still measures against the thresholds valid until 31 December 2025 (€5,538,000 and €221,000 respectively). Only the narrow band between the old and the new value is affected. On 21 August 2026, 0 open procedures fell inside that band — 0 % of all open procedures flagged below threshold. The German figures are unaffected, because there the procedural regime decides, not the value.
- None of this says anything about contract volume. Procedures are counted, not euros. A below-threshold procedure and a billion-euro tender count the same here.
- Snapshots are not annual averages. Anyone inferring annual volumes from the stock of open procedures must account for differing visibility duration — see the qualification under section 3.
- No causality. Differences between countries describe what was measured. They do not explain why.
How to cite
Friedrich & Clement, Facts on public procurement in Europe, collected on 21 August 2026, https://friedrich-clement.com/en/fakten. When quoting individual figures, please carry the collection date with them — the stock of open procedures changes daily.
Full methodology of the data collection: /en/methodology.